Understanding the Differences Between Types of Affordable Housing šļø
- EPS Team

- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
Affordable housing is critical for providing safe, stable, and reasonably priced homes to millions of Americans. However, āaffordable housingā is not a single categoryāit includes LIHTC (Section 42), Section 8 vouchers, Public Housing, Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH), HOME Investment Partnerships, Section 236, HUD multifamily programs, and state/local initiatives. Each program serves different populations and operates under unique funding, regulatory, and operational frameworks. š
Understanding these distinctions is essential for property management firms, investors, and executives. Proper knowledge ensures effective leadership, compliance, and operational excellence across diverse affordable housing portfolios.
According to HUD, over 17 million households benefit from affordable housing programs, yet there is a shortage of nearly 7 million units, highlighting the strategic importance of executive leadership. š

1. LIHTC ā Section 42 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit š°
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), Section 42, is the largest source of affordable rental housing in the U.S. It incentivizes private developers to construct or rehabilitate affordable housing by providing federal tax credits.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Households earning ā¤60% of area median income (AMI) š¢
Funding mechanism:Ā Federal tax credits exchanged for long-term affordability (15ā30 years) šµ
Compliance:Ā Strict documentation of tenant income, rent limits, and periodic audits āļø
Leadership focus:Ā Executives must manage multi-property portfolios, ensure regulatory compliance, and optimize financial performance š
LIHTC accounts for roughly 3 million units nationwide, making it central to affordable housing strategies. Leaders must have expertise in finance, audits, and portfolio operations. š§©
2. Section 8 Housing (Housing Choice Vouchers) š¦
Section 8Ā allows low-income households to rent private housing while the government subsidizes rent. Section 8 programs include tenant-based vouchersĀ and project-based subsidiesĀ tied to specific properties.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Households earning 30ā50% of AMI š
Funding:Ā Government subsidies reduce tenant rent payments š°
Operational considerations:Ā Leaders coordinate with Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) for compliance, inspections, and reporting š
Tenant services:Ā Many Section 8 properties offer social support programs, requiring executives experienced in community engagement ā¤ļø
HUD reports that over 2.2 million households utilize project-based Section 8, emphasizing the need for leaders skilled in compliance, tenant management, and operational efficiency. š¢
3. Public Housing šļø
Public HousingĀ consists of government-owned units operated by local housing authorities under HUD oversight.
Key Features:
Ownership:Ā Federal or local government ownership š¢
Target population:Ā Very low-income households (ā¤30ā50% AMI) š
Funding:Ā Annual federal budgets šµ
Leadership focus:Ā Executives must navigate bureaucratic structures, manage large portfolios, and maintain high service quality āļø
Public housing encompasses roughly 1.2 million units nationwide, requiring leadership with public-sector management skills and operational expertise. š ļø
4. Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) šļø
PSHĀ is designed for individuals experiencing chronic homelessness or with disabilities, combining housing with supportive services.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Chronically homeless and special needs residents ā¤ļø
Funding:Ā HUD, Medicaid, and state/local programs š°
Operational focus:Ā Integrates case management, healthcare, and property management š¢
Leadership focus:Ā Coordinating multidisciplinary teams, ensuring resident stability, and maintaining compliance š§©
PSH programs have been shown to reduce chronic homelessness by 20ā25%Ā in participating communities, demonstrating the impact of strong leadership.
5. HOME Investment Partnerships Program šļø
The HOME programĀ provides flexible grants to states and localities for development, acquisition, or rehabilitation of affordable housing.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Low- and very-low-income households (ā¤80% AMI) š
Funding:Ā Federal grants distributed to local jurisdictions šµ
Compliance:Ā HUD requires reporting on project completion, funding usage, and tenant eligibility āļø
Leadership focus:Ā Executives oversee project management, budgeting, and tenant placement processes š ļø
HOME-funded projects serve thousands of households annually, emphasizing the need for leaders experienced in both development and operations.
6. Section 236 ā Subsidized Mortgage Program š¢
Section 236Ā provides interest reduction subsidies to make rental housing more affordable. While less common today, many existing properties remain under Section 236 agreements.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Low-income households ā¤50% AMI š
Funding:Ā Interest reduction subsidies from HUD š°
Operational focus:Ā Compliance with HUD reporting and financial management āļø
Leadership focus:Ā Managing aging properties while maintaining affordability š ļø
7. HUD Multifamily Programs š¢
HUD administers several multifamily housing programs, including FHA-insured loans, rental assistance contracts, and project-based subsidies.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Low- to moderate-income households š
Funding:Ā HUD-insured loans and rental assistance šµ
Compliance:Ā Regular reporting, inspections, and regulatory adherence āļø
Leadership focus:Ā Executives manage complex financing, compliance, and operational performance šļø
8. State and Local Affordable Housing Programs š
States and municipalities often create additional programs to complement federal initiatives, including bond-financed developments, workforce housing, and local grant programs.
Key Features:
Target population:Ā Varies by program š
Funding:Ā Bonds, grants, tax incentives š°
Compliance:Ā Local regulations āļø
Leadership focus:Ā Navigating local policies, funding requirements, and portfolio growth strategies š§©
State and local programs often fill gaps left by federal programs, increasing the complexity of executive leadership needs.
Key Differences Between Affordable Housing Programs āļø
Program | Target Population | Funding | Compliance | Executive Focus |
LIHTC (Section 42) | ā¤60% AMI | Tax credits | State & federal audits | Financial oversight, compliance, multi-site operations |
Section 8 | ā¤50% AMI | Tenant/project-based subsidies | HUD & PHA reporting | Subsidy administration, tenant engagement |
Public Housing | ā¤50% AMI | Federal budgets | HUD compliance | Bureaucratic navigation, multi-site management |
PSH | Chronically homeless / special needs | HUD, Medicaid, state programs | Service coordination & reporting | Multidisciplinary leadership, resident stability |
HOME | ā¤80% AMI | Federal grants | HUD reporting | Project management, funding compliance |
Section 236 | ā¤50% AMI | Interest reduction | HUD reporting | Aging property management, compliance |
HUD Multifamily | Low- to moderate-income | Insured loans, subsidies | HUD inspections & reporting | Portfolio finance & operations |
State/Local | Varies | Bonds, grants, incentives | Local regulations | Policy navigation, growth strategy |
Executives must adapt strategies and leadership style depending on funding, regulatory complexity, and tenant needs. š
Executive Staffing Strategies for Affordable Housing š
Define Role Requirements and KPIsĀ š§
Occupancy and lease renewal rates š
Compliance and audit results š
Maintenance efficiency š ļø
Resident satisfaction ā¤ļø
Market Mapping and Candidate IdentificationĀ š
Identify executives with experience across LIHTC, Section 8, PSH, HOME, Section 236, HUD programs, and state/local initiatives š§©
Assess Operational and Regulatory ExpertiseĀ š
Multi-site portfolio operations šļø
Compliance with HUD, local agencies, and funding programs āļø
Financial management š°
Resident engagement š
Staff leadership š¤
Confidential Candidate EngagementĀ š¤«
Top talent is often passive; discreet outreach improves hiring outcomes š
Prioritize Cultural Fit and Resident-Focused LeadershipĀ š±
Culture-aligned leaders improve operational efficiency, retention, and resident satisfaction by up to 20%Ā š
Conclusion ā Leadership for Diverse Affordable Housing Programs š
Effective leadership is crucial across LIHTC (Section 42), Section 8, Public Housing, PSH, HOME, Section 236, HUD multifamily, and state/local programs. š¢
Strategic executive staffing ensures organizations can:
Optimize operations āļø
Maintain compliance āļø
Enhance resident satisfaction ā¤ļø
Achieve financial and operational goals šµ
Partnering with Executive Property Staffing, LLCĀ provides access to top executives, structured evaluation, and confidential engagement. šÆ
Strong leadership in affordable housing drives operational excellence, portfolio growth, and long-term resident stability, making executive staffing a strategic investment. š



Comments